Re: nit picking UDF

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Thu Mar 27 2003 - 00:40:12 EST


> ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S4 S4bios S5)
> You didn't specify the type of your ufs filesystem
>
> mount -t ufs -o
> ufstype=sun|sunx86|44bsd|old|hp|nextstep|netxstep-cd|openstep ...
>
> >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is
> ufstype=old
> ufs_read_super: bad magic number
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/lowlevel.c:65:udf_get_last_session:
> CDROMMULTISESSION not supported: rc=-25
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1472:udf_fill_super: Multi-session=0
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:460:udf_vrs: Starting at sector 16 (2048 byte
> sectors)
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1208:udf_check_valid: Failed to read byte
> 32768. Assuming open disc. Skipping validity check
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/misc.c:286:udf_read_tagged: location mismatch block
> 256, tag 18 != 256
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1262:udf_load_partition: No Anchor block found
> UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
> found reiserfs format "3.6" with standard journal
>
> Is all this blurbage necessary? I don't even have a disc in the 'rom drive
> because it causes the kernel to lock up hard on bootup if I do. Right at
> the moment, the 'rom isn't even plugged in.

Is this with 2.5.66?

I also get an oops during boot on 2.5.66 if I have
  hdc=ide-scsi
on the kernel boot command line. I have to remove it to boot 2.5.66.
I don't mind editing lilo.conf, but the oops shouldn't be what makes
me edit it.

~Randy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:27 EST