Re: [PATCH] asm offsets for i386

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Mar 27 2003 - 14:37:38 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: BUG or not? GFP_KERNEL with interrupts disabled."
Previous message: Antonino Daplas: "Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Much better framebuffer fixes."
In reply to: Brian Gerst: "Re: [PATCH] asm offsets for i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 10:11, Brian Gerst wrote:
> I already caught one bug with this, since someone recently added values
> to the feature flags array and didn't fix up the vendor id offset. What
> you propose fails with some non-gcc compilers (Intel's compiler for
> example, which supports gcc extensions) that don't optimize it away.

Too f*ing bad, this kind of debug test already exists in other
places of the kernel.

-- 
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: BUG or not? GFP_KERNEL with interrupts disabled."
Previous message: Antonino Daplas: "Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Much better framebuffer fixes."
In reply to: Brian Gerst: "Re: [PATCH] asm offsets for i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:29 EST