Re: NICs trading places ?

From: Joel Becker (Joel.Becker@oracle.com)
Date: Fri Mar 28 2003 - 17:25:25 EST


On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 10:10:37PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote:
> I just upgraded a box with 2 NICs in it to 2.5.66, and found
> that what was eth0 in 2.4 is now eth1, and vice versa.
> Is this phenomenon intentional ? documented ?
> What caused it to do this ?

        Is this a Red Hat system? I encountered the same thing on a
RHAS system. Basically, Anaconda had controlled the module load order
in /etc/modules.conf for 2.4. Because my network drivers were built in
in 2.5, they loaded in the order of the compile-in. This turned out to
be the reverse order.
        Swapping eth0 and eth1 in /etc/modules.conf fixed the problem
for me. This is not to say it is "Red Hat's fault" or that this is
entirely the same situation, but I figured this would make a good
datapoint.

Joel

-- 

"It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error." - Robert H. Jackson

Joel Becker Senior Member of Technical Staff Oracle Corporation E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:33 EST