Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 15:05:11 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
Previous message: Thomas Schlichter: "Re: NFS/ReiserFS problems 2.5.64-mbj1"
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
Reply: Roman Zippel: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303281219350.5042-100000@serv>
By author: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> The size of dev_t doesn't matter at all,
>

Bullshit.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
Previous message: Thomas Schlichter: "Re: NFS/ReiserFS problems 2.5.64-mbj1"
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
Reply: Roman Zippel: "Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:35 EST