Re: objrmap and vmtruncate

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Sat Apr 05 2003 - 21:23:27 EST


> The first test has 100 tasks, each of which has 100 vma's. The 100 processes
> modify their 100 vma's in a linear walk. Total working set is 240MB
> (slightly more than is available).
>
> ./rmap-test -l -i 10 -n 100 -s 600 -t 100 foo
>
> 2.5.66-mm4:
> 15.76s user 86.91s system 33% cpu 5:05.07 total
> 2.5.66-mm4+objrmap:
> 23.07s user 1143.26s system 87% cpu 22:09.81 total
> 2.4.21-pre5aa2:
> 14.91s user 75.30s system 24% cpu 6:15.84 total

Isn't the intent to use sys_remap_file_pages for these sort of workloads
anyway? In which case partial objrmap = rmap for these tests, so we're
still OK?

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST