Re: objrmap and vmtruncate

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Sun Apr 06 2003 - 11:13:04 EST


>> > 14.91s user 75.30s system 24% cpu 6:15.84 total
>>
>> Isn't the intent to use sys_remap_file_pages for these sort of workloads
>> anyway? In which case partial objrmap = rmap for these tests, so we're
>> still OK?
>
> What matters is the worst case not the best case. Users will do non
> optimal things on a regular basis.

Humpf. Well I have a fairly simple plan to fix it now. I'll either publish
some code or the plan later today, once I've thought about it a bit more.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:28 EST