Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink

From: Malcolm Beattie (mbeattie@clueful.co.uk)
Date: Sun Apr 06 2003 - 15:08:00 EST

Next message: Roland Dreier: "Re: [BUG][2.5.66bk9+] - changes to timers still broken - we don't oops anymore"
Previous message: Shawn Starr: "[BUG][2.5.66bk9+] - changes to timers still broken - we don't oops anymore"
In reply to: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink"
Next in thread: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink"
Reply: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Oliver Neukum writes:
> If you have an fd, the permissions based on the path are already
> bypassed, whether you can call flink or not, aren't they?

Not if it's opened O_RDONLY, for example.

--Malcolm

-- 
Malcolm Beattie <mbeattie@clueful.co.uk>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roland Dreier: "Re: [BUG][2.5.66bk9+] - changes to timers still broken - we don't oops anymore"
Previous message: Shawn Starr: "[BUG][2.5.66bk9+] - changes to timers still broken - we don't oops anymore"
In reply to: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink"
Next in thread: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink"
Reply: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:28 EST