-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Fredrik Tolf wrote:
> If I've missed the introduction of a fexecve syscall, I'm sorry for wasting
> your time.
There is no syscall. The people who don't want to use /proc for
security reasons better come up with fixes to make it acceptable. The
kernel lacks a number of syscalls which allow getting various pieces of
information and the only way to implement the functionality is via
/proc. The use of /proc is growing and you'll find that more than just
fexecve() will fail if you don't have /proc.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+kfrw2ijCOnn/RHQRArnmAJ4y6lXO3Msq3NvnnVLp/NHzJK6oUwCgvIFu
Aw+0YsJzlYFtawxSjR5xPEQ=
=SYEg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:32 EST