On Mon, 7 April 2003 13:48:12 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 07:10:37PM +0200, J?rn Engel wrote:
>
> > Some days ago, I've started a -je [*] tree which will focus on memory
> > reduction for the linux kernel.
>
> First, I'd like to say please, no, everyone can benefit from _every
> change_ you want to make in your tree, and it's not just an 'embedded'
> issue.
Right. The purpose of this tree is not to keep changes out of
mainline, but to test and enhance some of the uglier ones before they
go in.
In a perfect world, my tree would contain exactly zero patches. :)
> Second, please look up the archives (this past June -> August maybe?)
> for the CONFIG_TINY thread. Under that was my TWEAKS idea. If this
> sounds useful to you, I can try and dig up the last patch I had that got
> all of the dependancy stuff correct, except that you had to run a
> command if you changed a TWEAK value.
Will do. Just give me a little time.
Jörn
-- There's nothing better for promoting creativity in a medium than making an audience feel "Hmm I could do better than that!" -- Douglas Adams in a slashdot interview - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:15 EST