Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting

From: Chuck Ebbert (76306.1226@compuserve.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 07:13:56 EST

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: 2.5.67-mm1 cause framebuffer crash at bootup"
Previous message: Rob van Nieuwkerk: "O_DIRECT alignment requirements ?"
Maybe in reply to: Soeren Sonnenburg: "2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

ANdre Hedrick wrote:

>Does the broadcom driver have a test for who owns the intq?
>If it is eating the hpt370's interrupt, well you already see the picture.

Using edge-triggered interrupts with sharing is a bad idea, no?

--
 Chuck
 I am not a number!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: 2.5.67-mm1 cause framebuffer crash at bootup"
Previous message: Rob van Nieuwkerk: "O_DIRECT alignment requirements ?"
Maybe in reply to: Soeren Sonnenburg: "2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:18 EST