Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting

From: Chuck Ebbert (76306.1226@compuserve.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 09:35:55 EST

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "[Bug 561] New: Build failure in drivers/net/fc/iph5526.c"
Previous message: Ash Darkmoore: "patch 2.4.21 pre7 bug"
Maybe in reply to: Soeren Sonnenburg: "2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:

> > Using edge-triggered interrupts with sharing is a bad idea, no?
>
> PCI IRQ lines are level triggered

Even when /proc/interrupts says XT-PIC? I have uniprocessor
MPS 1.4 machines and build IO-APIC kernels for them because
I thought it was safer to share interrupts that way. The
four extra IRQ lines help, too. :)

--
 Chuck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "[Bug 561] New: Build failure in drivers/net/fc/iph5526.c"
Previous message: Ash Darkmoore: "patch 2.4.21 pre7 bug"
Maybe in reply to: Soeren Sonnenburg: "2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:18 EST