Re: [patch for playing] Patch to support 4000 disks and maintain backward compatibility

From: Joel Becker (Joel.Becker@oracle.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 18:21:09 EST


On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 03:14:32PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Linux does not arbitrarily break old systems. The aim must be
> > to have all combinations of (old/new) kernel with (old/new) glibc
> > to work well in all situations where old kernel + old glibc worked.

        100%

> Well, if you're going to do this, at least make it possible to tie all
> the sd devices to a single major (i.e. the numeric compatibility layer
> simply maps to the new single major scheme internally). It would also
> be nice for numeric compatibility to be a compile time option too...

        The real issue is that almost all consumers of the new kernel
will have a /dev populated with old numbers. Only new installs
(completely fresh) won't be burdened. And new installs won't be the
majority of 2.6 users for quite some time after 2.6.0.

Joel

-- 

"Copy from one, it's plagiarism; copy from two, it's research." - Wilson Mizner

Joel Becker Senior Member of Technical Staff Oracle Corporation E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:25 EST