Re: [PATCH] kdevt-diff

From: Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org)
Date: Mon Apr 14 2003 - 14:34:11 EST


Hi,

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> And the 32+32 split is what the new maximum would be, so ..
>
> The 16+16 split is not strictly necessary, but Andries pointed out to me
> that there are filesystems etc external storage that only support a 32-bit
> opaque dev_t, so we'd need to marshall the device number _some_ way for
> them anyway, and having a standard way to do that is better than having
> everybody come up with their own variations.
>
> (My prefernce for the 32-bit version would be 12+20 bits, but it's not a
> very strong one, and it doesn't really matter for the kernel proper, so I
> think Andries who has been tirelessly working on this for five years or
> more gets the final say on it).

If you want to argue this way, I urge to ask Al as well, as he did most of
the hard work to remove the block device limits. For some reason everyone
likes to disagree with me, but I would accept his judgement.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:33 EST