On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:41, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> I also have had a problem with ck5. I've been using the ckX kernel for
> a while now, and they're great kernels. ck4 was absolutely solid. I've
> been following the interactiveness changes in 2.5, although I don't use
> it, with some interest, so I was really happy when you announced them in
> ck5. However, it broke my Evolution. In large folders (such as LKML),
> the current message jumps around randomly umong the unread messages when
> I try and select the next unread message. This does not happen with ck4
> on an otherwise unchanged system (I use gentoo 1.4). I remember
> information about 2.5 breaking Evolution, but that was a long time
> before these interactive fixes. Here are my versions. If there's
> anything else you want, let me know.
Yes sorry it's ck5's fault, it's b0rken. Use ck6 which is on the website now
called ck6pre_2416030413_2.4.20.patch.bz2 It doesn't have the mem leak in ck5
and has the interactivity patch removed. Ignore the pre name it's going to be
renamed when I update my website et al. This should be as stable as ck4.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:34 EST