Re: Problem: 2.4.20, 2.5.66 have different IDE channel order

• Next message: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules"
• Previous message: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: BUGed to death"
• Maybe in reply to: Chuck Ebbert: "Problem: 2.4.20, 2.5.66 have different IDE channel order"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Problem: 2.4.20, 2.5.66 have different IDE channel order"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Problem: 2.4.20, 2.5.66 have different IDE channel order"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> For compiled in IDE the order is defined by the order on the PCI
> bus scan, not by the IDE layer
>
> (See ide/setup-pci.c:ide_scan_pcibus)

  Well, that matches what 2.4 does:

00:0d.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II]
00:10.0 Unknown mass storage controller: Promise Technology, Inc. 20268 (rev 02)
01:0b.0 Unknown mass storage controller: Triones Technologies, Inc. HPT366 / HPT370 (rev 03)

  2.5 nonmodular seems to be doing it in BIOS order -- the HPT370 BIOS
initializes before the Promise (and won't let it boot but I can deal
with that.) I'll probably replace it with a PDC20262 before looking
at any code...

--
 Chuck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules"
• Previous message: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: BUGed to death"
• Maybe in reply to: Chuck Ebbert: "Problem: 2.4.20, 2.5.66 have different IDE channel order"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Problem: 2.4.20, 2.5.66 have different IDE channel order"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Problem: 2.4.20, 2.5.66 have different IDE channel order"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:36 EST