Hey Andries,
before taking your message into account, i think you misunderstood my
question:
> Hmm. You did not forget to rerun LILO or so?
the error occurs when _running_ lilo, i.e. after typing "lilo" at the prompt.
greetings, chris
--- Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl> wrote:
> > but now, when running lilo, i get the following message:
> >
> > Fatal: First boot sector doesn't have a valid LILO signature
>
> Hmm. You did not forget to rerun LILO or so?
> If ide_xlate_1024 does nothing but "return 0" then
> handle_ide_mess() does nothing.
>
> What other differences does -ac2 have?
> It reintroduces a bug in the partition reading code - the fragment
>
> @@ -456,7 +556,7 @@
> if (!subtypes[n].parse)
> continue;
> subtypes[n].parse(state, bdev, START_SECT(p)*sector_size,
> - NR_SECTS(p)*sector_size, slot);
> + NR_SECTS(p)*sector_size, n);
> }
> put_dev_sector(sect);
>
> of the -ac2 patch is bad.
> In order to judge whether it is this or something else I would have
> to know much more about your system. What are the kernel boot messages
> for this disk under 2.5.67-bk9 that works and 2.5.67-ac2 that fails?
> What is the partition table? No disk managers in sight? Does LILO
> have lba32 or linear options?
> Does 2.5.67-ac2 work if you replace its fs/partitions/msdos.c by
> the vanilla one?
>
> Andries
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:26 EST