Re: [PATCH 2.5] report unknown NMI reasons only once (fwd)

From: Pascal Schmidt (der.eremit@email.de)
Date: Sun Apr 20 2003 - 10:19:37 EST

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: BK->CVS, kernel.bkbits.net"
Previous message: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>> Are you sure that the CPU voltage is correct?
> The motherboard is in autodetect mode...
> According to AMD's docs, my CPU wants 1.50V.
> According to the BIOS, what it gets is 1.48V.
> AMD does not specify a tolerance for Vcore, but I can try to manually
> set the motherboard for 1.50V and see if the NMIs disappear.

I had to set the motherboard to 1.52 volts to get 1.50 volts listed
in the BIOS. The NMIs are still there, so I'm going back to
autodetect mode.

-- Ciao, Pascal

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: BK->CVS, kernel.bkbits.net"
Previous message: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST