Re: [PATCH] new system call mknod64

From: jw schultz (jw@pegasys.ws)
Date: Tue Apr 22 2003 - 01:00:13 EST


On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 07:52:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >>
> >>The main advantage with making it a struct is that it keep people from
> >>doing stupid stuff like (int)dev where dev is a kdev_t... There is
> >>all kinds of shit like that in the kernel...
> >
> > If you want that good quality 64-bit code, try making it a struct
> > containing just a u64 :)
> >
>
> Perhaps:
>
> #if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> typedef struct { u64 val; } kdev_t;
>
> /* Macros for major minor mkdev */
> #else
> typedef struct { u32 major, minor; } kdev_t;
>
> /* Macros... */
> #endif
>

or a union?
typedef union { u64 dev; struct { u32 major, minor; } d; } kdev_t;

<duck>

-- 
________________________________________________________________
	J.W. Schultz            Pegasystems Technologies
	email address:		jw@pegasys.ws

Remember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:32 EST