wli wrote:
>> Spiffy; this should help debug various things.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 05:06:58AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> I forgot to mention: try comparing 2.2, 2.4 and 2.5.
> Also, this is what I've been using to look at interrupt entry
> point alignment. On 2.4 for sure, and probably on 2.5 you have
> a 1-in-8 chance of getting a pathologically badly aligned timer
> handler on 32-byte cacheline machines every time you compile
> (IRQ 0 entry address & 0x1f == 0x1c.) OTOH the pagefault handler
> has come up 8-byte aligned every time but I didn't look at the
> source to see if it's coded that way.
I had more in mind using it to verify the correctness of per-node IDT
stuff than checking optimality in general, but it does look very handy.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:12 EST