#if vs #ifdef - 2.4.x/2.5.x

From: Margit Schubert-While (margitsw@t-online.de)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2003 - 09:51:21 EST

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1 fs/ext3/super.c fix for orphan recovery error path"
Previous message: Andreas Schwab: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu: "Re: #if vs #ifdef - 2.4.x/2.5.x"
Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu: "Re: #if vs #ifdef - 2.4.x/2.5.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

        Anybody tried a "grep -r #if CONFIG" on 2.4 and 2.5
        kernels recently ?
        Most revealing :-)

Margit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1 fs/ext3/super.c fix for orphan recovery error path"
Previous message: Andreas Schwab: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu: "Re: #if vs #ifdef - 2.4.x/2.5.x"
Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu: "Re: #if vs #ifdef - 2.4.x/2.5.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:29 EST