Re: partitions in meta devices

From: Chuck Ebbert (76306.1226@compuserve.com)
Date: Mon May 05 2003 - 17:49:12 EST


> No, it should not. And devfs, for once, has nothing to do with it.
> RAID devices (md*) have _one_ (1) minor allocated to each. Consequently,
> they could not be partitioned by any kernel - there is no device numbers
> to be assigned to their partitions.
>
> > Could you please tell us which kernel version you're using?
>
> What would be much more interesting, which kernel are _you_ using
> and what device numbers, in your experience, do these partitions get?

 These patches appear to contain raid partitioning code of some sort:

   http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux-stable/

Only the first 16 md devices can be partitioned, though... major is 60,
minors are 0-15 for md0, 16-31 for md1, etc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:23 EST