On Tuesday 06 May 2003 2:06 pm, David S. Miller wrote:
> So, would you prefer this:
>
> Yes, this looks better.
If this is then generally acceptable, Marcelo, could you please take this and
disregard my earlier patch? I've tested this by building most of gentoo using
those headers and it didn't seem to break anything.
Thanks :)
--- linux-2.4.21-rc1-orig/include/asm-i386/types.h 2002-08-03
01:39:45.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.21-rc1-ac4/include/asm-i386/types.h 2003-05-06
15:07:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -17,10 +17,8 @@
typedef __signed__ int __s32;
typedef unsigned int __u32;
-#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
typedef __signed__ long long __s64;
typedef unsigned long long __u64;
-#endif
/*
* These aren't exported outside the kernel to avoid name space clashes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:26 EST