Re: Binary firmware in the kernel - licensing issues.

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 10:21:22 EST


On Maw, 2003-05-06 at 16:42, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Then, as you say, I need to know if the kernel developers have given
> permission to distribute a work which combines Atmel's blob with
> their source.[1]

Either the GPL does or it doesn't.

> Maybe we need Linus to pronounce, or RMS. Existing practice has several
> drivers with firmware blobs[2]. What is the status of those? Am I
> asking Questions Which Should Not Be Asked?

Na.. firmware stuff needs sorting out, but from the conversations I've
seem so far that involved people with a knowledge of law thats by
putting the firmware out of the kernel entirely

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST