Re: Another question about thrashing

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 17:18:24 EST


On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 10:20:00AM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
> There didn't seem to be much interest in my earlier post about kernel
> behavior when swap thrashing.
> So my question is, are we not concerned about system behavior when one
> process uses so much memory that it grinds everything else to a halt?
> It appears that a thrashing process is being given more preferential
> treatment than it should.

Design characteristic of global page replacement algorithms. It's not
getting touched for 2.5/2.6

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:28 EST