RE: 2.4.21-rc1 "breaks" older procps

From: Andre Tomt (andre@tomt.net)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 14:02:32 EST

Next message: Dave Hansen: "Re: top stack (l)users for 2.5.69"
Previous message: Andrey Borzenkov: "[PATCH] 2.4 devfs deadlock on concurrent lookups on non-existent entry"
In reply to: Andre Tomt: "2.4.21-rc1 "breaks" older procps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In my great tradition on replying to my own posts, here's another one.

> The IDE changes that went into 2.4.21-pre seems to make older
> procps unhappy, at least the one in Debian 3.0r1 (latest
> stable). Upgrading to a newer procps seems to fix this, but
> is this breakage really needed? "Breaking" stable debian
> userland is not very nice :-)

I forgot to mention what procps version I was using, it is 2.0.7 debian
patchlevel 9.

-- Cheers, André Tomt

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dave Hansen: "Re: top stack (l)users for 2.5.69"
Previous message: Andrey Borzenkov: "[PATCH] 2.4 devfs deadlock on concurrent lookups on non-existent entry"
In reply to: Andre Tomt: "2.4.21-rc1 "breaks" older procps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:32 EST