Re: bkcvs not up-to-date?

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 18:16:03 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] TTY changes for 2.5.69"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] TTY changes for 2.5.69"
In reply to: John Levon: "Re: bkcvs not up-to-date?"
Next in thread: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: "Re: bkcvs not up-to-date?"
Reply: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: "Re: bkcvs not up-to-date?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> > and checked out the tree, but cvs log Makefile still indicates 2.5.68
> > is the lastest version. What am I doing wrong?
>
> I have the same problem, the CVS gateway got stuck some point in the
> middle of 2.5.68 and has had no apparen t updates since

Its even worse: part of updates gets there. Like CREDITS file is
up-to-date but Makefile is not.
Pavel

-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] TTY changes for 2.5.69"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] TTY changes for 2.5.69"
In reply to: John Levon: "Re: bkcvs not up-to-date?"
Next in thread: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: "Re: bkcvs not up-to-date?"
Reply: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: "Re: bkcvs not up-to-date?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:33 EST