On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 04:51:18PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:16:43AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > How would the driver differentiate between .compat_ioctl == NULL being a
> > case where it should fail because there is no translation, or a case
> > where it should use the compatible .ioctl? Maybe there should be an
> > extra flag like use_compat_ioctl. So:
>
> .compat_ioctl == NULL: fail
> .compat_ioctl == .ioctl: everythings fine, I read the docs
That makes sense aswell.
> > This would also solve the current problem where a module that is
> > compiled with compat ioctl's using register_ioctl32_conversion() is not
> > usable on a kernel compiled without CONFIG_COMPAT, even though it very
> > well should be.
>
> You mean you want to load the same binary module in differently
> compiled kernels? That's a flawed idea to start with..
I don't, but I don't see the point in it not working in this case.
-- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:28 EST