William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Try the timebase instead.
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:14:13AM -0400, Chris Friesen wrote:
> The timestamp is not hard to get. The problem is getting a
> medium-frequency (2KHz or so) hardware interrupt to drive the test.
> On intel, you can do this by programming /dev/rtc. This does not work in
> powerpc.
I don't understand why you're obsessed with interrupts. Just run your
load and spray the scheduler latency stats out /proc/
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:30 EST