[PATCH] Use correct page protection for put_dirty_page

From: Andi Kleen (ak@muc.de)
Date: Sun May 11 2003 - 03:08:41 EST


put_page_dirty must use the page protection of the stack VMA, not hardcoded
PAGE_COPY. They can be different e.g. when the stack is set non executable
via VM_STACK_FLAGS.

I added an fallback path for now because I'm not sure if the stack VMA
is always predowngrowed here, if the printk better it may be also needed
to add an stack extension here.

-Andi

--- linux-2.5.69-amd64/fs/exec.c-o 2003-04-20 21:21:50.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.5.69-amd64/fs/exec.c 2003-05-11 08:38:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -292,7 +292,9 @@
         pgd_t * pgd;
         pmd_t * pmd;
         pte_t * pte;
+ pgprot_t prot;
         struct pte_chain *pte_chain;
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
         if (page_count(page) != 1)
                 printk(KERN_ERR "mem_map disagrees with %p at %08lx\n", page, address);
@@ -314,7 +316,13 @@
         }
         lru_cache_add_active(page);
         flush_dcache_page(page);
- set_pte(pte, pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite(mk_pte(page, PAGE_COPY))));
+ vma = find_vma(tsk->mm, address);
+ if (!vma) {
+ printk("put_dirty_page: stack vma not extended yet %lx?\n",address);
+ prot = PAGE_COPY;
+ } else
+ prot = vma->vm_page_prot;
+ set_pte(pte, pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite(mk_pte(page, prot))));
         pte_chain = page_add_rmap(page, pte, pte_chain);
         pte_unmap(pte);
         tsk->mm->rss++;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:35 EST