Re: 2.5.69+bk: "irq 15: nobody cared!" on a Compaq Armada 1592DT

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 04:34:58 EST

Next message: Ivan Kokshaysky: "Re: Improved DRM support for cant_use_aperture platforms"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [PATCH] htree nfs fix"
In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: 2.5.69+bk: "irq 15: nobody cared!" on a Compaq Armada 1592DT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 02:23:40PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Bugger, this is due to yenta_probe_irq.

Umm, but this is yee standard old interrupt probing - calling
probe_irq_on() and causing interrupts to be generated.

This seems to be something that these IRQ changes completely missed;
interrupt probing does not register interrupt handlers, so "retval"
in handle_IRQ_event will always be zero, and we'll always produce
these complaints. I'm sure there's lots of other older drivers using
IRQ probing which are going to suffer in a similar way.

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ivan Kokshaysky: "Re: Improved DRM support for cant_use_aperture platforms"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [PATCH] htree nfs fix"
In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: 2.5.69+bk: "irq 15: nobody cared!" on a Compaq Armada 1592DT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:50 EST