Using a "2.5.xxx" number was a bad example. Consider it replaced by
"2.4.17" and "2.4.18".
Regards
Henning
On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 16:44, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:09:33PM +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > >From a user land perspective, only major Linux vendors or
> > organizations could enforce such a logo program, it would cost wads of
> > cash and it will really suck if you currently run the certification
> > process for Linux 2.5.102 for your driver and right before you're
> > done, 2.5.103 is released and you have to start all over again.
>
> Certifying anything against a development series kernel is completely
> pointless. Breakage outside the driver itself could have adverse
> affects. Example: For the last dozen or so kernels, the i845 AGP driver
> crashed on exiting X. Turned out to be a VM bug.
>
>
> Dave
-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH hps@intermeta.de +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:52 EST