RE: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional

From: Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 21:18:13 EST

Next message: Jean Tourrilhes: "Re: airo and firmware upload (was Re: 2.6 must-fix list, v3)"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "[PATCH] __optional and __keep"
In reply to: Christopher Hoover: "RE: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Next in thread: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 14 May 2003, Christopher Hoover wrote:

>
> > This should also break kernels with MMUs ( see mm_release ).
>
> I don't believe it does as there's a cond_syscall entry for sys_futex.

Yep, you're right cond_syscall does it.

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jean Tourrilhes: "Re: airo and firmware upload (was Re: 2.6 must-fix list, v3)"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "[PATCH] __optional and __keep"
In reply to: Christopher Hoover: "RE: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Next in thread: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:55 EST