Re: time interpolation hooks

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 21:38:01 EST


On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 15:00, David Mosberger wrote:
> Andrew> (Those function pointers should go away in favour of
> Andrew> optionally-stubbed-out static calls. Minor point).
>
> Really? On ia64, we want to use cycle-based interpolation by default,
> but if firmware indicates that the cycle-counters may drift, we want
> to switch to one of several possible external counters (which counter
> gets used depends on hardware/drivers are is present).

I think Andrew is really suggesting to declare these two things
in an arch header, so if one needs it to be a function pointer one
can make it so.

-- 
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST