Re: Test Patch: 2.5.69 Interrupt Latency

From: Alan Stern (stern@rowland.harvard.edu)
Date: Mon May 19 2003 - 13:49:49 EST


On 19 May 2003, Paul Fulghum wrote:

> the patch applied cleanly and worked for me
> (prevented global suspension). Having the lengthy
> waits outside of the ISR is a definate plus, and
> the debounce makes sense.

Good. I'll submit this, if no other problems arise.

> My machine does not have APM/ACPI facilities so
> I can't test the suspend. It is getting pretty
> dated, but the economy dictates I live with it for
> a while longer :-)
>
> Does you laptop use the PIIX4? If it does and uses only
> one port, I would be very interested to see if
> one port is continuously reporting OC (hardwired).

I don't remember what chipset it has. But it definitely includes a UHCI
controller with only one port. I'll check it out tonight.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:35 EST