David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew, I assume it's OK with you if I update the ia64 code to the
> proposed interface and then send you an updated patch?
Sure. It's be good to see an ia32 implementation which can be beaten on.
Maybe John can look into that?
>From an implementation point of view, I wonder if all platforms will need
the indirection?
If not then it would be better to just do
update_wall_time_hook(sys_tz.tz_minuteswest * 60 * NSEC_PER_SEC);
in kernel/time.c and let the architecture decide whether it wants to add
the extra overwriteable hooks.
So include/asm/time-interpolation.h has:
#include <asm-generic/time-interpolation.h>
and asm-generic/time-interpolation.h has:
struct time_interpolator {
...
}
static inline void update_wall_time_hook(unsigne long nsec)
{
time_interpolator.update_wall_time(nsec);
}
if you get my drift.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:35 EST