The person who posted their DMESG had it unset.
Here's an archive of the post:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0305.2/0440.html
And the line:
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set
From: Lars (lhofhansl@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun May 18 2003 - 22:03:16 EST
--eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey W. Baker [mailto:jwbaker@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 5:01 PM
To: Tomas Szepe; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HD DMA disabled in 2.4.21-rc2, works fine in 2.4.20
On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 15:29, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > [alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk]
> >
> > On Llu, 2003-05-19 at 21:04, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > > I was using Via IDE chipset and, yes, I had configured the kernel for
> > > VIA support. That's why it worked in 2.4.20. But it stopped working
in
> > > 2.4.21-rc.
> >
> > VIA IDE should be working reliably, my main test box is an EPIA series
> > VIA system so the VIA IDE does get a fair beating
>
> This person is running with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX unset.
No, this person is not.
-jwb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:37 EST