The only prolem with using setserial is my console is one one of these serial
port (headless system. I failed to mention that earlier). So everything
that comes out the console at the wrong rate :( However, Milton D. Miller
suggested looking at early_serial_rgister, which is used on ppc and ia64.
That might help.
--John
On Tuesday 20 May 2003 08:09 am, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2003-05-20 at 01:56, J.C. Wren wrote:
> > One of the things I noticed in the port of 2.5.69 to the 386EX embedded
> > system is that serial.h appears to not be a mach-xxx positionable file.
> > The 386EX board uses standard 8250 type serial ports, but at 3.6864Mhz
> > instad of 1.8432Mhz. There appears to be no way to build a patch set
> > without modifying include/i386/serial.h. Would this not be better places
> > in mach-defaults? I'm trying very hard to modify as few files as possible
> > when building these patch sets.
>
> Making asm-i386/serial.h include a mach- file sounds the right thing to
> do. mach- for x86 is pretty new so a lot of stuff that maybe should be
> in it, hasnt migrated yet.
>
> The counter argument however is that you should be able to use setserial
> to adjust the baud base so you dont need to change anything 8)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:40 EST