"Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> > From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@digeo.com]
>
> Hi just wanted to add some comments below:
Appreciated, thanks.
> > drivers/acpi/
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > o davej: ACPI has a number of failures right now. There are
> ...
>
> Working on these (they're all in bugzilla), more help needed of course
> :)
OK, well if they're safely bugzilla'd I shall remove them from here.
Unless you think they're drop-dead stop-ship material.
> > +o mochel: it seems the acpi irq routing code could use a
> > serious rewrite.
>
> No the problem is the ACPI irq routing code is trying to piggyback on
> the existing MPS-specific data structures, and it's generally a hack. So
> yes mochel is right, but it is also purging MPS-ities from common code
> as well. I've done some preliminary work in this area and it doesn't
> seem to break anything (yet) but a rewrite in this area imho should not
> be rushed out the door. And, I think the above bugs can be fixed w/o the
> rewrite.
Where do you think this work sits on the seriousness scale? Is it
affecting a lot of people? Is it a large-scale restructure?
It sounds to me like it's a non-trivial piece of ACPI brain surgery and
that I should continue to track it, yes?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:48 EST