Re: [CHECKER] 12 potential leaks in kernel 2.5.69

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 04:50:10 EST


> > schedule();
> > barrier();
>
> Iirc, the above will leak 4 bytes (plus overhead) once per kernel
> boot and controller. This only happens for broken hardware and the
> alternative is memory corruption, depending on how broken the hardware
> is. Wontfix.
>
> Alan, was that correct?

It should only leak in the error path case. If the controller didnt reply
then it still owns that ram and for the sake of a few bytes its better to
play safe yes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:48 EST