Re: I/O problems in 2.4.19/2.4.20/2.4.21-rc3

[Con Kolivas (kernel@kolivas.org)]

On Sun, 25 May 2003 14:28, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:27:20AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Even though you're not Marc I do agree with you. The problem is well
> > described as either poor interactivity (the window wiggle test) or
> > starvation in the presence of certain scheduler hogs (for whatever
> > reason) since the interactivity patch from mingo. Dropping the max
> > timeslice is a bandaid but destroys priority based timeslice
> > scheduling. Dropping the min timeslice will bring this back, but at
> > some point the timeslice will be so low that low priority cpu
> > intensive tasks will spend most of their time cache trashing.
>
> The fact that it's a "bandaid" and that it "destroys priority-based
> timeslice scheduling" makes it a shenanigan. If you're having problems

I don't disagree it's a shenanigan.

> solved by capping timeslices, you have someone's timeslice and/or
> priority growing too large for some reason.

So there is a benefit to timeslices being as large as 200ms? I'll take your 
word for it.

> It'd be far better to help figure out what went wrong.

Love to help. No idea where to begin. All we can do is report what helps the 
symptoms and hope those in the know can decipher it from that.

Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/