Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc3 : IDE pb on Alpha

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl)
Date: Sun May 25 2003 - 16:26:43 EST



On Sun, 25 May 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 10:45:00PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 May 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:00:46PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > hda: task_no_data_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > > > hda: task_no_data_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
> > >
> > > Can you revert back to your previous kernel and run badblocks read-only on
> > > it a few times. Your drive may be going bad.
> >
> >
> >
> > Everything is okay, older drives don't understand some commands.
> > I will fix it, but now its low on my TODO list.

> Bart, is there any chace you could change the printks to show the name of
> the command that caused the drive to produce the error (assuming non
> ide-tcq, with tcq I'd immagine that it'd be a bit harder).

For taskfile based IO its trivial, but IDE is not yet switched to it
(will be soon).

> This way someone who hasn't read the IDE spec might be able to tell that
> this isn't a warning of impending failure.

> BTW, is this information encoded in the two lines above somewhere, and if so
> how would I read it?

Only failed irq handler, drive status and error returned by drive.
"error = 0x04" means command aborted.

Regards,
--
Bartlomiej

> Thanks,
>
> Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/