Re: [PATCH] 2.5 Documentation/CodingStyle ANSI C function declarations.

[Jörn Engel (joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de)]

On Fri, 30 May 2003 22:40:55 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> 
> I would agree with that strategy, if the zlib wasn't actively
> maintained anymore and we'd have to take over that part anyway.  But
> as it is, this will create extra work with little bonus on our side,
> except to set a better example maybe.

In related news, the kernel zlib still claims to be 1.1.3.  The
security bug fixed with 1.1.4 was a double-free problem which doesn't
apply to the kernel version anymore, but other functional changes were
missed as well.  Does anyone really understand what those changes are
about? David perhaps?

If not, I will prepare a patch.

Jörn

-- 
They laughed at Galileo.  They laughed at Copernicus.  They laughed at
Columbus. But remember, they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
-- unknown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/