Re: SCO's claims seem empty

From: Paul Rolland (rol@as2917.net)
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 11:22:44 EST


And if it is only comments, it could be Sco that has taken then from
Linux, without any damage to their code ;-)

Paul

> If it isn't simply carefully doctored choices designed
> mislead clueless analysts. You are also ignoring at least two
> other things - code that is common because its from the
> reference (eg intel locking code) and code from third party
> vendors legitimately supplied to both Linux and SCO.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:30 EST