I'll go look. CVS takes way too long to tag, it forces a rewrite of
every file. I did attempt to filter out tags that weren't of the forn
v2.* but it looks like I screwed up.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:44:37PM +0200, Pascal Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I noticed both the 2.4 and 2.5 BK->CVS trees don't have version tags
> any more (v2_5_70, for example, as in the old tree).
>
> Is this intentional? Did CVS take too long to tag all files or something?
>
> It was quite a nice feature to have them, very useful for finding out the
> differences between certain kernel versions. I can live without it,
> though. It's still a nice service without the tags. (Thanks!)
>
> --
> Ciao,
> Pascal
-- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:28 EST