On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:44:37PM +0200, Pascal Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I noticed both the 2.4 and 2.5 BK->CVS trees don't have version tags
> any more (v2_5_70, for example, as in the old tree).
>
> Is this intentional? Did CVS take too long to tag all files or something?
>
> It was quite a nice feature to have them, very useful for finding out the
> differences between certain kernel versions. I can live without it,
> though. It's still a nice service without the tags. (Thanks!)
Looks like the tags are on the ChangeSet file only. Which is why I
didn't notice. You could get a timestamp from the tag on ChangeSet and
use that for a -D argument.
A quick script could do this for you. I think it's wise of Larry to keep
it this way.
-- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:28 EST