Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70

From: Andreas Jaeger (aj@suse.de)
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 23:40:46 EST

Next message: Nick Piggin: "Re: [PATCH] io stalls"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: /proc/bus/pci"
In reply to: Bryan O'Sullivan: "Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70"
Next in thread: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> writes:

> On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 14:32, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>
>> Line below seems to be wrong, given hpet period is in fsecs.
>
> I don't believe the HPET code got much testing in 2.4, and my boxes

It got quite some testing on my boxes,

> don't have ACPI table entries for the HPET, so it's troublesome to test
> it on them.

Please tell your board vendor to fix it,
Andreas

-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nick Piggin: "Re: [PATCH] io stalls"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: /proc/bus/pci"
In reply to: Bryan O'Sullivan: "Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70"
Next in thread: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:31 EST