> The new pci_domain_nr() is good for adding the PCI domain
> number to the /sys/devices/pciN/* names, but I think that's
> not the proper representation. It should really be
>
> /sys/devices/pci-domainN/pciN/*
>
> So we can pave the way for when we'll stop play bus number
> tricks and actually have overlapping PCI bus numbers between
> domains. (I don't plan to do that immediately because that
> would break userland & /proc/bus/pci backward compatiblity)
>
> What do you think ?
This should have been obvious to me last week:
/sys/devices/pciN/busM/devQ/fnP/*
N is the thingy number. (domain, segment, hose...)
It's important to get the interface right, even if
that means a bit of short-term trouble. We'll be
stuck with the interface, like it or not, for a
damn long time once 2.6.xx gets established.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:35 EST