In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306160907470.2079-100000@notebook.home.mdiehl.de> you write:
> Why using keventd? Personally I'd prefer a synchronous thread start/stop,
> particularly with the thread living in a module.
> Maybe some generalisation of:
It would be syncronous: but doing kernel_thread yourself means trying
to clean up using daemonize et al, which is incomplete and always
makes me nervous.
An implementation detail to users, but IMHO an important one.
Also, this replaces complete_and_exit: the thread can just exit. This
simplifies things for the users, too...
Cheers,
Rusty.
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:17 EST