RE: Sco vs. IBM

• Next message: Greg KH: "[PATCH] USB updates for 2.4.21"
• Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] 3c359.c: remove comparison that is always true"
• Maybe in reply to: Martin List-Petersen: "Sco vs. IBM"
• Next in thread: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Sco vs. IBM"
• Reply: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Sco vs. IBM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From: miquels@cistron-office.nl [mailto:miquels@cistron-office.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:34 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Sco vs. IBM
>
> In article <20030619141443.GR29247@fs.tum.de>,
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote:
> >There's no license reason today why there are two big desktop projects
> >(GNOME and KDE).
>
> There is. If you want to develop a commercial application under
> KDE you need to pay TrollTech for the Qt license. Basically
> TrollTech controls all commercial KDE applications.

I'd say that GPL file appended to the dual license
of Qt says otherwise ... but IANAL...

Iñaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own
(and my fault)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Greg KH: "[PATCH] USB updates for 2.4.21"
• Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] 3c359.c: remove comparison that is always true"
• Maybe in reply to: Martin List-Petersen: "Sco vs. IBM"
• Next in thread: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Sco vs. IBM"
• Reply: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Sco vs. IBM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:31 EST