Re: Sco vs. IBM

From: Gerald Stuhrberg (grstuhrberg@aaahawk.com)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 17:37:34 EST

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "[Bug 849] New: [perf][tiobench] tiobench sequential write degrades in 2.5.72-bk2"
Previous message: Greg KH: "[BK PATCH] USB fixes for 2.5.73"
Next in thread: David Schwartz: "RE: Sco vs. IBM"
Reply: David Schwartz: "RE: Sco vs. IBM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I just have one quick queston while all of you are debating. If how is
it right for SCO to target IBM (or any company for that manner) if the
code doesnt belong to them.

Sorry for the ignorance. I missed something somewhere :/

Gerald

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "[Bug 849] New: [perf][tiobench] tiobench sequential write degrades in 2.5.72-bk2"
Previous message: Greg KH: "[BK PATCH] USB fixes for 2.5.73"
Next in thread: David Schwartz: "RE: Sco vs. IBM"
Reply: David Schwartz: "RE: Sco vs. IBM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:00:17 EST